*"the Licensing for the product would have include a statement saying no use of Nudity"

*Daz had a similar kinda thing in their licence for the AMG figure. (I sent that back simply because it didn't work) but If I'd read that licence first I or one a smilar agreement I probably wouldn't have bought either. While I don't render out much 'cheesecake' - I might want to in future and I know a lot of people do. 

So who decides whats "right" or "wrong" ? daz, rendo, the vendor, US, EU, or UK government ?
 
Also what happens if I don't see or read that licence, or choose to ignore it in favour of the store licence then what ? I could be on the other side of the planet -so anything spent making lawyers richer could be wasted.  

BTW - Ratscloset - thisn't a critisim of your approach. I just sometimes question just how viable or valid these licences are.  

Pinky - you left the lens cap of your mind on again.