I'll play both sides against the middle on that. :)

Yes, I'd rather wait for something that works than receive as scheduled in poor working order.

On the other hand, the notified release was for 'fall' just before fall arrived and must have been under scheduled consideration.  For something of this magnitude, you don't say "it'll be ready tomorrow" when things are still being developed. You do it as final testing is ongoing, the box designs are finalized and going for manufacture - you know what I mean.  So, how far could it have been from finalization that they basically said it would be released within a month or two?

Now, they've moved it to 'winter' which could indicate a rescheduling due to the change of ownership - mainly.  Unless there was some major unexpected snag in one of the features being implemented, the actual software should be ready to go.

JM2C

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone