Sun, Dec 1, 3:10 PM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)



Subject: Please read, "Innovative Minds Don’t Think Alike" [NYTimes]


MGD ( ) posted Sun, 30 December 2007 at 8:02 AM · edited Thu, 25 July 2024 at 3:37 PM

Attached Link: Innovative Minds Don’t Think Alike [NYTimes]

Greetings,

Today's online NYTimes (12/30/2007) included an interesting article
on thought and innovation. 

Please comment. 

--
Martin


durleybeachbum ( ) posted Sun, 30 December 2007 at 8:14 AM

Ha! yes! I recommend to you the poem "The calf path" by Sam Foss. Todays NYTimes article is not a new thought. I am no good at computer speak but when I googled this poem I got http://holyjoe.net/foss3.htm


MGD ( ) posted Sun, 30 December 2007 at 8:48 AM

Please use this link to read "The Calf Path". 

Sounds like the NJ DOT. 

--
Martin


ABodensohn ( ) posted Sun, 30 December 2007 at 12:38 PM

It's an interesting read, but the focus is, IMO, too much on the business world. Not entirely surprising, mind you, given that the article appears in the "Business" section. But as a general statement about creativity and how ideas are created and communicated it falls a bit short, viewed from where I sit. The experiment with the "tappers" is certainly interesting, but after starting with a rather broad and general statement the article fails (again IMO) to carry through and apply that broad statement in a broad context. Instead we get some general ideas and experiments presented to make a point about a rather specific field. And the way creativity works in the workplace is something I think can't be linked that easily to more general thoughts about creativity. Just compare the opening statement to the last few paragraphs of the article: At the end of the article there is nothing left about how creativity works in general, but only talk about specific contexts. As I said, I think it's an interesting read. But it falls short of providing what it pretends to be about in the opening paragraph. Unexpected twists and turns may be a staple of writing, but here it leaves me rather cold, and a bit disappointed.


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.