serene opened this issue on Jan 01, 2008 · 4 posts
CuriousGeorge posted Thu, 03 January 2008 at 1:21 PM
The benefit of your preferred output is that you're rendering at a lower fps than ntsc, so that's a timesaver right there. However, you are rendering to a slightly higher resolution (vs ntsc).
encoding for your target, I rec: 720 x 576 x 25fps x interlaced. Use an mpeg2 or h.264 codec with a high bitrate probably @ 2700 kbps
Ideally, HD is best because it supports progressive display which, obviously, looks nicer and you don't have to worry about deinterlacing on the client-side.
ciao,
G