Who decides the worst? What you think is bad may be someone elses frigin inspiration. I have seen crap get big ratings because the postie is popular or belongs to that group.

I agree that negative rankings will help provide troublemakers a means to ruffle feathers. It would also give the vain a way to help thier, " most awsome of all art in thier own mind," a helping hand in those ratings. Look what happened in the critique club. Complained about how things were commented and rated and then designed to takeover those ratings, all in the name of the group.

I don't know an answer or if there even is one. It's kind of a chicken or the egg debate that will go on for ever here.

A vote of "NO" here too.