sackrat opened this issue on Jan 14, 2008 · 56 posts
Quest posted Fri, 18 January 2008 at 9:53 AM
“…as America decides who its next president will be, no one has had the guts to challenge the incumbant with questions about the legality of his office and how he got to sit in it.”
Bryster, that’s because that particular conspiracy theory has long been debunked here and no one can proof it. In fact, if you follow the theory’s logic it happened twice that the majority of Americans voted for him (he’s been in office two terms now…8 years). I’m personally no fan of Mr. Bush but how do you figure that happened? Do you think for one minute that if the Democratic party had any inkling of said conspiracy it wouldn’t be used to impeach him in a heartbeat? A conspiracy that large would certainly leave a trail and many loose ends untied, an enticing meal for a well-equipped and hungry predator.
Yes Silverblade protecting our borders against the infiltration of terrorists should have been top priority since 9/11 and little of that has been mentioned. But I take issue when natural tragedies are compared to wanton terrorist massacres of innocent people.
Quest