I still believe that if we based our galleries on new fresh ideas or the actual creativity factors of the "artists" posting instead of the individual programs themselves, thereby accentuating the "artists" rather than what the "program" can do we might get around all this titillation factor. I don't know HOW it could be done, but it would be great if we had a top 20 or top 40 that highlighted the best of ALL categories all the time in much the same fashion. Then it would not be so "poser" directed and also not so promiscuous either, because not all programs are mainly "people" programs. As well, MOST artists use MORE than just one program as a tool anyways, so this here that we have now is somewhat innacurate a lot of times as just "poser" or just "bryce" etc. We usually base our posting categories on "mostly" of whatever we used or where we "feel" we may have the most impact. An overall "best" would illimate all this and be much more fair and true and would result in variety.