molsmith opened this issue on Feb 12, 2008 · 122 posts
kuroyume0161 posted Wed, 13 February 2008 at 5:15 AM
Unfortunately, there is not much difference between hidden dials and not - the same memory is still consumed, for instance. Except maybe for the sparsity of the dial parameter interface - but even then, with dial groups, an apparent sparsity can be accomplished by group organization alone. So the real effort is in restricting control - that is, subsuming control to the default interface provided.
I'm not convinced there is a purpose beyond this (control). One can 'hide' infrequently used dials in an infrequently accessed dial group for so-called 'experts' without resorting to draconian measures (file hacking).
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the
foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg
off.
-- Bjarne
Stroustrup
Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone