Giolon opened this issue on Feb 17, 2008 · 76 posts
Giolon posted Sun, 17 February 2008 at 1:41 PM
Actually, she does have clothing on, and the reason stated for its removal was not lack of clothing. It was exactly as I have quoted, "A lot more Boob then needed in the thumbnail." (additionally, the reason stated for the 2nd thumbnail was "still too much boob").
I can pull other thumbnails from other of the site's galleries (after the thumbnail rule) that show more, in some cases also "nude" by your definition Acadia, (no clothing showing, only a hand or an image crop to hide the naughty bits). If you'd like, I can go get them for you and post them here to show how arbitrary the enforcement of the rules has been.
In any case, this is now tangential to the point of my original post. The rules have been clarified for me.
¤~ RadiantCG ~¤~ My Renderosity Gallery ~¤