Forum: Photography


Subject: Censorship v. Advertising v. Art? [nudity]

MGD opened this issue on Feb 11, 2008 ยท 45 posts


Jean-Luc_Ajrarn posted Thu, 21 February 2008 at 10:32 AM

I still don't can't figure out the "nudity = sex" idiotic assumption.

Nothing is wrong with nudity, IMO.
Nothing is wrong with sex, either.
Both are natural.

Even prudes' parents have been nude (at least when they were born, to wash themselves, and between changing from one set of clothes to another) AND have had sex gasp, hence how they got to existence in the first place.

Unless they were the unknown lewd neighbor's offspring, who somehow got mixed up at the maternity...
... wait a minute... the prudes' parents would not be at the maternity to be the victims of this baby mix up in the first place if they didn't have sex. Moot point. ;)

I am so sick of people who choose to get offended by whatever.
Especially when they are of the "do what i say, not what i do" kind.

If we go the slanted logic route, wouldn't we be born clothed if nudity was not natural?
Sheesh... rolls eyes

Nudity is "offending", while violence is "okay"?
I don't beeping think so. :(

disclaimer: this post only reflects my personal opinion, and i am sorry to say i am not sorry if someone chooses "to get offended" by what i stated or the way i did it.