Keith opened this issue on Feb 20, 2008 · 23 posts
Netherworks posted Thu, 21 February 2008 at 5:17 PM
Quote - Me, I'm waiting for the early adopters to get things ironed-out (for V 4.2 and A4) :)
I figure I can go get 'em in a few weeks or so... A3 has her faults, but she's quite usable (whereas A1 -> A3 was a huge improvement, A4 appears to be minor tweaks and the nice bennie of having V4's body). V4 is usable in her current form, so no biggie there, either.
/P
Agree with you pengy. I think I posted this elsewhere around here but A1 to A3 was a vast improvement in function and looks (debatable to some, I'm sure), whereas A3 to A4? Eh? A3 is still very useable. There was/is never a problem with marketing stuff for A3 or V3 so it would have been just as good a move to have A4 standalone - and potentially more profitable.
Funny how the reasons change constantly, eh?
Okay, V1 was a standalone figure and V2 was a morphs package. V3 was a brand new unimesh for various reasons. Now A4 is a morph for V4. Step forward, step backward, step forward. Are we line dancing yet?
hehe
Only thing I dislike is the whole V4 in the core runtime setup. Bleh. Fix a problem to step backward.
.