Vile opened this issue on Mar 01, 2008 · 7 posts
Vile posted Sat, 01 March 2008 at 7:24 PM
Now you will look back at my original 2 posts and see that I did not have a problem editing my image but the pose was impossible to change without showing the side of babys bottom. So my solution put a diaper on a child inside an artifical womb.
It was not showing any genitalia. and was picture absolutely from the side.
I also said I was not angry at this. But lets take a little more time on this subject
I guess a reproductions of the World renouned Master Leonardo Davinci would be out of the question? At least here in Renderosity. Yeah I can really see how portraying the Christ can be concedered porn these days...
How about William-Adolphe Bouguereau heck I saw so many of these on Valentines cards its almost amazing
Paolo Uccello?
As for the all ages I believe most of us who had any art in School in Grade school know of Leonardo. I would also like to remind you all of these paintings are in Major Art museums where kids will be taking field trips to at some point. Funnier still is these are all done pre 20th let alone 21st century. There is a HUGE difference between depicting the human body and pornography. And Yes the is subjective censorship.
Yeah we have come a long way BABY LOL....