Cage, in the meantime, is a bit lost, as usual.  LOL

As I understand it, there are some problems with trying to go completely over to Numeric (beyond the fact that there don't seem to be any useful examples that I can find).  The Linear Algebra module is broken in Poser 7, which means LinearAlgebra and Array modules can't be used and such functions need to be hand-coded.  That wouldn't be a crisis from our perspective, I guess, since we're doing vector math and not matrices.  But it seems to limit the possibilities (at least based on the limited examples I've seen).

But I'm totally confused about "object-oriented" versus "top-down".  I checked one of my three Python books on this, and it launches into listing the benefits of object-oriented programming, as opposed to C-style, without actually explaining what "object-oriented" really means.  I'm left assuming that Python modules give an example of such programming.  That's pretty much the only place I ever see that approach (as I understand it) used.  Pretty much all the implementations of Python I've seen for Poser or Blender use the C-style programming (as I understand it).  Which makes it a bit hard for someone who's teaching himself to figure out how to do things in a better way.  Hence, perhaps, all the spaghetti code that gets bandied about.  :(  I gather that many of my problems would be solved if I could be object-oriented, and I think I'd like to be, but I can't figure out how.  LOL again.

===========================sigline======================================================

Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking.  He apologizes for this.  He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.

Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below.  His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.