ArcPaladin opened this issue on Mar 15, 2008 · 13 posts
Cage posted Sun, 16 March 2008 at 5:18 PM
Ah, I think the reference to material pertained to the physical properties for the simulation, rather than Poser materials handling. I see. That's a problem with the idea of accurate simulation of the physics, I assume. One might get away with just fudging it, to create a result which "looks right".... Hmm.
===========================sigline======================================================
Cage can be an opinionated jerk who posts without thinking. He apologizes for this. He's honestly not trying to be a turkeyhead.
Cage had some freebies, compatible with Poser 11 and below. His Python scripts were saved at archive.org, along with the rest of the Morphography site, where they were hosted.