>> Thank you for rudely and effectively demonstrating exactly what I was saying.

Excuse me, missy, but kindly note that you were counting paragraphs, which is pretty well up there on the Rudeness Factor As An Argumentative Device. I will further remind you that it was you who described older Poser content as "ancient", not I. If you see your own words as rude, that's your problem, not mine. Now, if we can return to the subject at hand?

I gather you dont like Poser's rendering engine. You're not the first. But that has little, if any, impact on the age of the files: I can import them into just about any other software, using any one of a myriad rendering engines, and they still work. You probably dont like Poser's interface either; again, that should mean nothing in terms of the basic geometry and the application of textures.

So what exactly is it that you dont like about the older content? What, in your world view, is so disposable? The clunky meshes? The polygonally-formed eyebrows? The poor rigging? Again, no disagreement, but that has nothing to do with the technology itself. It's how all 3D models are made. So what, in specific, is your issue?

docandraider.com -- the collected cartoons of Doc and Raider