Quote - Sean in case I was not clear, I don't care to talk with you because you're snotty and rude. 

No new news here...  I just ignore those.

--

Quote - > Quote - So the next time I get new tires on the car, you're asserting that four chariot wheels will work just fine instead of Goodyear or Firestone?

Sean - are you even sure what you're arguing for anymore?

Yep, I sure do. If you seriously think that chariot wheels are even marginally close to Firestones, then I'm more on target that you'll ever hope to be. But that's not the issue, is it?

You're asserting that because the concepts are the same, the results are as well. You also seem to be treading well beyond your depth here. We're talking about software... not what you want, demand, or desire... but the technical constraints of what's possible when developers try to balance between what is, what was, and what can be.

Quote - No, it was a serious question that merits more than the usual song and dance from you. You have made it plain over the past I dont know how many years how much you really dont like Poser. Hey, that's cool. No sweat off my brow.

I have my preferences, but that certainly doesn't mean that Poser cannot be improved, so kindly stop backpedaling away. Here's what you keep running from: You asserted (in no uncertain terms) that backwards compatibility must be maintained at all costs. Fact is, there are times and contexts where that's not possible, or even desirable. Sucks, but true.

(redacted some stuff - no need to pinch anyone's nose here...)

/P