Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Does Poser need to change or the figures need to change?

corleone1 opened this issue on Mar 25, 2008 · 285 posts


MikeJ posted Fri, 04 April 2008 at 9:07 PM

Quote -
Huh ?
Ever heard of spherical falloff zones ?

'course I have. I just don't like the way they work. PITA, far as I'm concerned. I've said everything in this thread in the context of how I see it. It's all been hypothetical. I don't expect any of this to happen.
Nevertheless it has been an interesting thread.

Quote -
Do you really think that a professional modeller who spent years to hone his skills all of a sudden says:
"Oh man, that Vicky 4 Girl sure is hawt and now she comes even pre-rigged for Max.

Nope. I also never said anything about it being prefab content dependent, but with the ability and the option to be able to have that if one wants.

Quote -
If it's so easy, why has none of the DAZ or Poser meshes been professionally weightmapped yet ?

Couldn't tell you why, but I suspect it's due to a lack of demand, not feasibility. It actually is quite easy to rig up a DAZ figure in LW, for example, and I'm sure in any other program. It's just a mesh, after all.

Quote -
And yes, even devoloping a completely separate "über-Poser" will harm the "actual" Poser, because I somehow doubt Smith-Micro will pay two separate development teams.

I actually said that already, a few pages back.