bagginsbill opened this issue on Apr 29, 2008 · 496 posts
pjz99 posted Thu, 01 May 2008 at 9:23 AM
I agree that some people are overreacting a bit, these figures are pretty clearly not intended to be extreme closeup beauty queens/handsomeness kings. On the other hand, I'm not too impressed with what it says on the tin - 15,000 before adding any clothing is not exactly low poly, and if they were going for a low-detail figure for architectural visualization use they probably should have shot for something like 2,000-5,000 with clothing modeled onto the figure - I can think of some applications for a crowd of naked people, but for general-purpose arch vis use this is probably a bit heavier than a lot of people would care for, compared to other examples already on the market for this sort of thing.
http://www.complete-characters.com/cc_index.php?PHPSESSID=f037a7685106f91ddaf4991fffad7845