Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Time to retire Poser 4 MATS?

byAnton opened this issue on May 05, 2008 · 34 posts


kuroyume0161 posted Mon, 05 May 2008 at 1:42 AM

Quote - Whilst you're right about the lack of trasference of procedural material nodes from Poser to other applicatoin, kuroyume, the same is true of almost every other modeler or 3d program I can think of. Short of baking the texture (which doesnt' really transfer the proecdurals, but merely flattens them down to a ne wtexture map), I can't think of any two 3d programs which allow you to share procedural systems - Maya and C4D wouldn't talk to one another, for example. So this is not so much a problem for Poser as it is simply a part of the 3D situation.

JonTheCelt

I agree completely.   But many 3D applications have some form of texture baking whereas Poser has no such thing.   It would be great to have something like this available when doing any interchange but alas...

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone