Ah, yes -- it's good to see that these types of threads always go through their natural evolutionary process.  First: the OP which kicks off the dispute: which leads to a lengthy debate (replete with personal recriminations -- questioning the characteristics of the opponent's ancestors, their maturity, their motives for saying what they've said, etc.) : which is then followed by laments over the worthlessness of the entire exercise -- which said 'entire exercise' is totally beneath the notice of the triangulated 'above-the-fray' lament-makers......so: of course it follows that it has to be commented on.

Here's the lesson:  no one should ever participate in a forum thread -- controversial (on any side of a given issue -- right or wrong) -- or even non-controversial.  Because if you do participate in a thread: then you always run the risk of being lamented over for having spoken up and expressed an opinion on a given subject.

Non-participation makes one superior to the participants......and that's always a neat trick.  It's a trick which is commonly used by politicians who wish to appear to be better than their 'bickering' opponents.  Sometimes it even works. 

:m_sleep:

Something To Do At 3:00AM