fivecat opened this issue on Apr 28, 2008 · 149 posts
XENOPHONZ posted Thu, 08 May 2008 at 1:45 PM
Quote - We now return you to the impassioned defense of near-naked cross-eyed bimbos waving heavy medieval weaponry in alleged sacred spaces...
/P
No, no, no.......now we return to defending the high-concept Art of a high-end-CG-generated version of a completely naked Angelina Jolie strutting around in a dark cave. That's FAR less trite than V4's in temples with swords -- because only rank amateurs would produce trite stuff like that.
BTW - I heard a report that Angelina Jolie (the real version, not her CG counterpart) was real-world upset & angry over her 3D avatar's constant state of nudity in that movie. Apparently, she wasn't informed that her CG-self would be naked all of the time. Jolie obviously understands that people only go & cough up their filthy money to see such movies (with her in them) so that they can properly appreciate a famous work of primitive early European literature. High culture, and all of that jazz.........
V4 in a temple is hackneyed because she's done in Poser; naked cave-dwelling Angelina Jolie is High Concept Art because she was done up in some high-end program or other.
But admittedly -- it is true that one of them has probably been animated with better lighting. So I'll give you that.