if they've got due process of law there, the cops can raid the galleries and grab what they
believe is kiddie porn as evidence, then the prosecuting attorney(s) can review said evidence
to decide if any charges will be filed.  it carries far more weight if a jury decides that
the stuff is kiddie porn.  judges and juries in democratic societies have come to realise in recent
years that the right of children to be protected from predators outweighs the desire of artists
or pedophiles to sell, distribute or display nudie pix of kids.  I ain't a lawyer.

however, it's completely moot in regard to poser sites. hundreds of sites (and site owners)
are involved in poser, and none of 'em allow users to post explicit nudie pix of kids.  the
negativity surrounding these discussions of kiddie porn just re-inforces the poser site
owners' vigilance in regard to explicit nudie pix of kids IMVHO.