All of this entirely misses the point.  I am an average guy who likes beautiful women, therefore, when I see a nude, reasonably attractive woman, regardless of the artist's intention, I have sexual thoughts.  When a pedophile sees nude children, he (and it is statistically almost always he) has sexual thoughts.  And the last thing anyone should want to do is feed that kind of monster.  All this outcry about artistic "rights" is all well and good, but just because you have the "right " to do something, doesn't mean you should.   Although I'm so liberal it would make most of the people commenting here look like the "moral majority", in the final analysis, I'd rather protect kids than artists.