praxis22 opened this issue on Jun 19, 2001 ยท 15 posts
praxis22 posted Wed, 20 June 2001 at 10:31 AM
Hi, Well I can vouch for the fact the SMV is indeed "fit" to use a British aphorism :) I bought the pack, but as noted above at the start, I got sidetracked, so appart from a little tweaking with the face I've not used her all much, though I did find a use for her undies and the texture that is used for the bra, (such is life :) I loved the chocolates comment though! :) As for nudes of X or Y via poser, I doubt they would ever pay enough, certainly not when you consider what Playboy would pay anyway :) But if you want nudes why not do what everyone else does and fake it. That was actually an idea that came to me, why not simply graft a photo of the head onto a posed body, that way you could shape the pose to the image, instead of grafting one head onto a different pose/body, and hoping the pose is close enough so that it looks at least reasonable. I used to do that sort thing as a callow youth, never worked very well, but I was using Digipaint on an Amiga 500, (with cheese wedge, remember that :) Personally I prefer to look at them with thier clothes on these days, it really is better to conceal than reveal :) I'd avoid nudes of Ms Lopez on general principal, there is such a thing as too much hype, it is after all, just another Latina? body, looks much like the next I should imagine. Now if somebody was willing to pay the stars body doubles to get scanned, who would know the difference? ;) Though Quagnon has a very good Britney for Vicky in freestuff somewhere, should you feel the need :) later jb