Still not had an answer explaining how the US government inspecting communications crossing its borders, something it has always had the power to do within the constitution, offends the 4th amendment.

**
*According to the law...  the agency doing the listening has three days to tell a court Who they have been listening to, why and then get a warrant to keep it legal... *  **This administration feels it is too clumsy and retarded.,  it wants to do surveillance without court warrants...  No holds bar...  no ones business...

Now that' s unconstitutional cause getting a warrant is the process of keeping oversight ( an eye) on the those particular agencies...  without the warrants ( over sight)  how do we know if they are not listening right here at home as well as over seas..!  since no one is watching... !  

Is this what you wanted to know...

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------