TomDart opened this issue on Aug 11, 2008 ยท 31 posts
girsempa posted Fri, 15 August 2008 at 1:45 PM
I don't agree with you Mike. If it was so easy to get those photo's, news agencies could send any amateur with a camera... much cheaper than their best professionals that they're sending now. There ARE billions of photographs of those 'pitiful faces'... but only the very best generate a certain impact.
Those agencies expect immediate and guaranteed results when they send someone on a mission, and they know they're going to get those results if they send a seasoned professional. If they sent me, that result would not be guaranteed... do you really think it's that easy..? And if you think that they have all the time in the world to fulfill their mission, think again... time is money, and every wasted second is a second too much.
We do
not see things as they are. ǝɹɐ ǝʍ sɐ sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝs
ǝʍ