Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Why is Judy so little liked?

dphoadley opened this issue on Aug 21, 2008 · 153 posts


bopperthijs posted Fri, 22 August 2008 at 12:51 PM

Well, let's face it:  if the poserguys had done a decent job on their own models, DAZ would have been bankrupt for years now. The only reason why people complain about the DAZ-models is because you have to pay for it, and the fact that a lot of people have paid for it, does mean that DAZ has done a good job, true or not?
 I agree that the default DAZ-models don't look so good, but if they did DAZ wouldn't sell any of his morph++ and texture packets. And that's where the poserguys leaves us in the cold, you have to buy morph-packets for their models from third-party vendors. Ok, you have the face-room, but as soon as you apply some emotion you have the old Judy, or Jessi or Sydney back, and have you forget the horrible knee and elbow joints? I thought they would have fixed that with poser 7, but Sydney, Jessi G2 and even Miki 2 bent worse than a Barby.
I'm sorry to say but DAZ is miles ahead if it comes to 3d-(female) models. V4 is in my opinion the most versatile female model at the moment. And of course it has it's drawbacks, like the enormous derriere when it bents over and it's over-discussed armpits, but it has progress and support and that's more than you can say about the genuine poser-models.
V4 was an evolution compaired to V3 and so will V5, and V6 be. And that's the reason why I would buy any new upgrade of Victoria. One of the coming generation of Vx's will be a model that is capable of representing any woman on earth with lifelike anatomy and rigging.
Judy will be by then long forgotten or someone with a nostalgious mind does have  to made a Judy Fullbody morph for Vicky.

just my €0.02

Bopprrrrt.

-How can you improve things when you don't make mistakes?