It looks like AM, but that is superficial analysis.

The actual meshes look completely different - but only using an exemplary model (V4) against AM at this premature time.  But, does anyone here think that M4 is going to have a completely different topology than V4?  ReallY?  I mean, REALLY?  Have you been following DAZ for any time lately?  Really?

(Is my point getting through at all?)

In other words, has DAZ every deviated 91000 degrees in its current version models so that one is completely different from the other?  They are self-admittedly aiming for UBIQUITY among these figures (most especially in topology) in each version.

My case rests on the overwhelming evidence...

Court adjourned.

C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg off.

 -- Bjarne Stroustrup

Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone