miikaawaadizi opened this issue on Oct 15, 2008 · 183 posts
XENOPHONZ posted Wed, 22 October 2008 at 11:17 PM
Quote - And as for Xeno's comment about "popular amorality" having been tried before, when he is right, he is right. As I recall, Lot slept with his daughters, and the Bible makes it clear that God considered Lot to be a righteous man ...
I don't quite follow your intended connection here -- a more appropriate metaphor would derive from the fate of the Vale of Siddim -- from which Lot and his daughters had escaped. BTW - Lot was essentially drugged by his daughters. At the time, he was unaware of what was happening to him. In other words: the result wasn't from a voluntary act on Lot's part. And as for the daughter's part: at the time, they'd just witnessed the total destruction of what, to them, was the entire world. After which they found themselves living alone in a desolate cave in the wilderness. So the girls most likely actually believed that they were doing something good.....perhaps even (so they thought) necessary. So it all follows.
But once again: the story of Lot and his daughters vs. the effects of current "popular amorality" ties in to the cultural debate in ways that I doubt that you'd anticipate in advance -- or likely appreciate.