TheBryster opened this issue on Jan 03, 2009 · 42 posts
Quest posted Fri, 09 January 2009 at 7:55 AM
Grafikeer…first off let me say that I’m an admirer of your work. You are a wonderful and prolific artist and my hat’s off to you in all due respect. As for being the winner of this last challenge I offer my sincere congratulations. Please note that I’m in no way inferring that your parameter rules need changing. As the challenge winner you have every right to set the parameters for the next challenge without question, those are the rules. My post was not directed solely at you and should not in the least be taken as a personal affront. And if you felt this was the case then I offer my apologies. I made a broad statement and the post was meant for all, especially for future challenge winners to keep in mind. Like Dan, I feel more fish will come to nibble in the pond when the corn bread is spread around.
“…I didn't think that was catering to only those that have "mastered the program"...in fact, I think there are many areas that have much more to offer! By thinking outside the box and exploring, who knows what Bryce can still do!”
I agree with you, my comment; “We know this is a challenge but it is suppose to be a challenge for all not just the few that have come to master the program.” was a nudge response countering Draculaz’ seemingly benign statement; “…the best way to make up your own challenge rules: win it :)”
Dan Whiteside mentioned that there are a lot of folks that are not interested in “Bryce only” challenges and I’m in agreement with him. He also mentioned that this would be the third one since July of ’08. I haven’t been keeping count but July was barely six months ago and if this is true then half of the challenges fall into that category. At least two of the parameters you set certainly seem to bear this out;
A) “…Imports are allowed, but they must not be the main focus of the scene.”
B) “…no overworking with filters etc.”
These are restrictions, seemingly unobtrusive but restrictions nonetheless. My contentions with restrictions were already explained in my prior post. Although, to be fair, you might find me more in accordance with your second restriction for obvious reasons but on the other hand I certainly understand that many effects are difficult or just not possible to construe using Bryce only.
I fully concur with your third parameter and further appreciate the mixed genre aspect of the challenge.
Not to belabor this half beaten dead horse any further I’ll leave this here.
Happy Brycing to everyone.