RobynsVeil opened this issue on Jan 24, 2009 · 490 posts
RobynsVeil posted Sun, 25 January 2009 at 6:55 AM
Good ON ya, IsaoShi! Thanks for your support. So, do you kinda see where I'm going with this? have you looked at nodes and wondered: "How the heck did they know to put that and that together to get that??"
I want the tools to be accessible. CobaltDream opened the whole "You can do maths on colours" concept. Now, I want to see what can be done.
In reading RuntimeDNA Node Cult threads one gets the impression that numbers greater than 1 are allowed and have meaning, what exactly that means is still very obscure. Only experiments are going to clarify that for all of us, IsaoShi! We each of us need to be doing those experiments and sharing our experiences. And even if we examine the same node and come up with different results and conclusions: it's gold, mate. More than what's out there now. Publish, question, compare, discuss.
The total here is going to be infinitely greater than the sum of its parts.
The fact that this idea is meeting with some enthusiasm has its own merits: means that I'm not the only one who feels a massive hole here!
Monterey/Mint21.x/Win10 - Blender3.x - PP11.3(cm) - Musescore3.6.2
Wir sind gewohnt, daß die Menschen verhöhnen was sie nicht verstehen
[it is clear that humans have contempt for that which they do not understand]