Quote - > Quote - Trekie Girl

Quote -  Hm. I must admit I think it's stupid to limit your models to one of the two "Posers" - it's not like DS can't read Poser models.

What would be the benefit of doing a DS only model?

I'm not a DS user at all so I may be missing something obvious. I have DS-savvy people helping me make my own products DS-ready to cater for both programs... 

What if the vendor doesn't have poser but does have DS?  That would be the simplest explanation for not making it usable in poser.  To bad there isn't any DS to poser export tools that can save things like morphs...

Still as it was asked is the MODEL made in DS? Not likely. DS isn't amodeling program and as such, the OBJ files ect must have existed on some point of that product's life. 

I just don't understand why anyone would cut himself off from the large market that is Poser. But that's just me.  Yes he might not be able to rig the thing for poser without poser.. but at least suppluy the obj's.. that's not hard to do...

I am pretty certain that when those products were released, there wasn't any rigging tools available for DS.

I am agree with you 100% on cutting out the poser market.
As soon as I noted that, No Sale came up.

"That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."
Thomas Jefferson