Ok, I just got a sitemail from OE about the post that was deleted.
This was my post:

*I feel the screening process is off.
I regularly see images published that are definitely less than some images that get rejected.
I'll give an example (I'm not trying to bash anyone, just making a point):

Rejected:
http://1x.com/mview.php?p=r120880

Published:
http://1x.com/v2/#photos/macro/23743/
http://1x.com/v2/#photos/macro/23493/

Also, this one was rejected, then simply flipped, then published:
http://1x.com/v2/#photos/latest-additions/23757/

It seems a lot of screeners have a hard-on for extreme close-ups while largely disregarding other aspects, such as focus.
It also seems that (despite the site rules) heavy post-processing is actually favored over natural images.
Am I missing something ?

I'm also disappointed that my latest images were rejected without any kind of feedback, despite the fact that one of them made it through the first round of screening.
In order for them to be posted in critique I have to answer some questions, but I won't bother.
The questions:

• What do you want to tell with this photo?
• What reaction did you expect people would get while watching this photo?
• What is your reaction while watching this photo?
  Now how would you answer these questions for the above images ??

This was the rest of the email:

Inactive photographer.

This post has been deleted by a forum moderator. If you want to know more why, contact the site crew. Most common reasons for post deletion:

• Your post was sent to the Photo critique-forum but didn't include any photo critique. Only post in this forum if you have some critique to give to help the photographer to improve the photo.
• Your post violated our rules for the forum, see here: http://www.onexposure.net/forum.php?action=rules

Regards, Forum moderators