tresamie opened this issue on Mar 14, 2009 · 42 posts
Gossamyr posted Wed, 01 April 2009 at 12:30 PM
A woman has the choice to continue or end a pregnancy, the man has no voice and yet he is financially liable for a moment they both chose. The edifice (the manface/tree) is the system that has grown rank and corrupt and has the righteousness to say it can not be changed. The rabbit had the misfortune of being born male in a certain forest (country) and is now without choice and enslaved for 18 years for being nice to someone. Legally extorted, his right to liberty, the pursuit of happiness, all of it, gone because of a woman taking away his choice, that rabbit lost his privelige to drive because of this and might go to jail, which is taxpayer money, even though the woman admitted she does need the money. It's about revenge.
A child needs to be the choice of both parents, nothing good can come of a child being born 2 people venting steam(as in no relationship). The argument that everyone falls back on is this 'Well, you did engage in sex, so yer guilty!' This is the argument of a mentally retarded person using kindergarten justice. The only thing I am guilty of is the exact opposite of manslaughter.
The accidental creation of life, and that should have a seperate finite penalty due to sexual negligence, and yet the choice to continue the pregnancy is not mine, er the rabbits...;-)
Remember the radical says burn down the forest, the reactionary says kill the rabbits, everyone else doesn't care until it's them. We need to start caring so nothing overly rash is done.
I apologize fer the soapbox, but this is wrong and needs to be changed