santicor opened this issue on Apr 21, 2009 · 45 posts
lesbentley posted Wed, 22 April 2009 at 6:55 PM
Quote - Dude, I don't know what you're trying to pull here with this straw man argument stuff about what's in the bag. If I create morphs in Zbrush. They're mine. Anyone with half a brain cell would know that they did the work themselves. It sounds to me like you're trying to scare someone off from being a content creator of morphs as their own stuff with boogy men. What exactly is your point?
I resent what you have said above, and feel you have absolutely no grounds for saying it.
In your original statement you said about PMD that "It's quick, easy and interferes with absolutely NO copyright issues."
Well NO, that's not true, I could send you dozens of PMD files that do infringe copyright. If did that I'd prove my point, but probably get sued. And what is the point?
There is nothing inherently safe about PMD. And form your quote above you seem to be claiming that there is. Nonsense! Neither is there anything inherently dangerous about them. The point is NOT that PMD is safe, or dangerous, the point IS that it is totally irrelevant. And to claim that if you package morphs in a PMD you will have "absolutely NO copyright issues", as if the mere act of placing morphs in a PMD somehow magically removed any copyright restrictions, is dangerous garbage.
Whether your package is PMD or some other format is not relevant, it's what you put into the package that determines whether it will be in breach of copy right. NOT the format of the package!
P.S. As to your post above, I don't get the relevance of that either.