Sun, Dec 1, 6:10 AM CST

Renderosity Forums / Photography



Welcome to the Photography Forum

Forum Moderators: wheatpenny Forum Coordinators: Anim8dtoon

Photography F.A.Q (Last Updated: 2024 Nov 26 6:56 am)



Subject: Memory Cards - How to Extend Their Life and Keep Them Healthy


TomDart ( ) posted Thu, 07 May 2009 at 9:23 PM

All in all I have had good success with the cards, mostly Lexar and Delrin with a few Sandisc in there.  I use Compact Flash.  I will take a look at the link.   Thanks.

For having prints made locally  (Walgreens) I  have found the little USB memory sticks very handy, no need to burn a disc and fits in the pocket easy.   Take care.          Tom.


whaleman ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 2:03 AM

The multiple accessing is an important point in the life of the CF card. Although I've been in electronics forever, I never thought of that aspect. I will reformat my CF cards frequently now. Thanks for that link!

Wayne


prutzworks ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 2:30 AM

pretty useful info
thanx for link Bruce

minder is meer


TomDart ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 7:00 AM

This was well worth reading. 


MGD ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 5:24 PM

I read the cited article. 

I agree that you should copy the image file from the flash memory to your HDD ... and then process the image from your HDD. 

That would be a good workflow  ... and the HDD and the flash memory would be backups of each other.  

The article claims that the PC continues to access and/or scan the flash memory after the copy. 

As far as I can tell ... my direct experience ... that is NOT true. 

A flash memory reader has an activity LED ... I do see it blink while the copy to the HDD is happening. 

However, after that copy finishes, the LED is inactive ... I would take that to mean that the PC has stopped accessing the flash memory. 

In that regard, the article raises a flase warning. 

Comments, please ...

--Martin


TomDart ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 5:40 PM

Martin, I am not sure if the LED is the only indicator; however, that does seem reasonable.  Which ever, I alway have followed the copy to drive and disconnect the flash card.   My reason was backup and having a "hard copy" on the computer, not to save the lifespan of the card.


bclaytonphoto ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 7:39 PM

another good point was formatting in camera..

I didn't do this at first..but it makes a lot of sense..

been working that way for a year now

www.bclaytonphoto.com

bclaytonphoto on Facebook


TomDart ( ) posted Fri, 08 May 2009 at 7:49 PM

And if you need to recover an image?  I deleted shots my wife wanted with her mom to send to relatives.  Fortunately, the card had a file structure that little Lexar Image Rescue 2 couild use.  I got images even which were deleted before and were "under" images from the recent delete. I had formatted the card in camera, as always...maybe that made a difference. I honestly don't know.

I got all back but one and it showed fine on Photoshop ™ but  I couldn't save since the program said the image had an improper termination or something like that.   

I really don't know how critical to image recovery all of this is but to me I was safe and family got the shots....


Privacy Notice

This site uses cookies to deliver the best experience. Our own cookies make user accounts and other features possible. Third-party cookies are used to display relevant ads and to analyze how Renderosity is used. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understood our Terms of Service, including our Cookie Policy and our Privacy Policy.