Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Shouldn't an INJ pose actually inject something?

chriscox opened this issue on May 18, 2009 · 25 posts


chriscox posted Tue, 19 May 2009 at 7:16 PM

Quote - > Quote - No support for v4.1 or 4.2 or at least not in the copy of IPB 1.5 that I redownloaded yesterday.

I think someone did some config files, check the FreeStuff here, and the DAZ forums.

Quote - Apparently it became OK to label MOR poses “INJ” because that’s what IPB does.

Before V3, all character poses were effectively MORs, but the only poses named as MOR were those for setting non-character morphs.
The use of the MOR tag for poses setting character morphs seems to have crept in over time, and used interchangeably (or as well as) INJ.

Maybe before 2001, but by 2001 some people were already referring to MOR poses as a way of setting morph channel values for characters.  By the end of 2002 even I had made a MOR pose for sharing a dial spun V2 character.  

I always though that MOR poses were just poses that set Morph Channel values, character or otherwise.

 

Granted for V2 most people added something like “_morph” to the poses file name and actually adding MOR to the file names wasn’t done much until V3.

Chris Cox