Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Shouldn't an INJ pose actually inject something?

chriscox opened this issue on May 18, 2009 · 25 posts


Conniekat8 posted Wed, 20 May 2009 at 12:38 AM

Quote - > Quote - I can do a bit cr2 editing  and write utilities to automate stuff, but frankly I'm not up on the fine points of MOR vs INJ. I try it on a base V4 and if it doesn't work, I run it on a loaded one. Beyond that, meh, I'm more worried about the report that the TV boxes are controlling our minds.

My point is if a pose were labeled MOR then I would know before hand that I needed a V4 with the morphs already loaded and not be wasting my time trying to use the pose on a base V4 that didn't have the Morphs already installed.  You apparently don't care if you are wasting your time with mislabeled poses but I would rather not.  Granted, it’s not really a big deal, just a minor annoyance that's been bothering me.

I take it product requirements didn't say that, for example V4.2 base, and V4.2++ morphs are required?  If it didn't, they should have.

Some people like MOR pose type charactes quite a bit, because it makes it quick work fitting superconforming clothes to them.... Assuming superconformers do have those morphs in them.

I'd reccommend returning the character in question, and letting the merchant know it's because it's promo material wasn't clear enough about what you're getting.

Generally though, having an "INJ" pose doesn't always mean it's going to inject deltas. term "INJ" in commercially available character packs often ends up being used to inject and remove dial values (MORPH Poses), rather then morph deltas. For some reason MOR Poses didn't really catch on.

Hi, my namez: "NO, Bad Kitteh, NO!"  Whaz yurs?
BadKittehCo Store  BadKittehCo Freebies and product support