raven opened this issue on Jun 25, 2009 · 1706 posts
RorrKonn posted Wed, 22 July 2009 at 6:58 PM
Quote - > Quote - > Quote -
Sorry everyone for going on a tangent! At any rate, I enthusiastically agree that having Poser support Catmull-Clark subdivision like D|S and most modelers would be very useful.
Just to Sub D a quad is not good enuff.
Sence the model all quad rule is as brite as a dinosaur.
I want the model all quad rule as dead as the dinosaurs.http://64.234.196.28/RK_Tutorial/RK_T_Mix_Sub-D_Tri-Quad.htm
Maybe Poser could talk to XSI :)
Is that a published subdivision method that anyone can implement in their software? Because I'd rather stick with original Catmull-Clark with all it's limitations than go to something that Wings will never have because of the license fees.
TS,LW,Modo,C4D,Maya,Max ,XSI,Wings,Blender you can model a 100% quad mesh and sub D 100% quads,Just like wings.
http://64.234.196.28/RK_Tutorial/RK_Sub_D_Quads.htm
thay all haveCatmull-Clark or it's = this is technolagy that is very old 11+ years old at least.
============================================================
The
Artist that will fight for decades to conquer their media.
Even if you never know their name ,your know their Art.
Dark Sphere Mage Vengeance