ziggie opened this issue on Aug 05, 2009 · 761 posts
pjz99 posted Mon, 10 August 2009 at 6:31 PM
Quote - I'm heading in the same direction - tiny Irradiance sample size. Refining, I ended up with 17 minutes and just about the same image as Paul posted using max quality settings.
This has a huge impact (positive impact). Quite surprising. Smith Micro really should have added an "Advanced Render Settings" interface for managing this stuff. At least the Dimension3D script is there though. It renders slower with this setting at 0.1 but "slower renders" is preferable to "unusable renders".