ziggie opened this issue on Aug 05, 2009 · 761 posts
Whichway posted Wed, 12 August 2009 at 8:52 PM
The 4096 is also about 0.5% when used as a number of random samples. My problem has been with the second IC value; it should mean a really bad allowable error. But looking at the red dots that the other parameters cause, I think it's just that the other parameters force enough samples anyway the cache max error is always satisfied until the requirement gets silly.
Whichway
[Base, low quality parameters posted above.]