thomasrjm opened this issue on Aug 26, 2009 · 26 posts
Magik1 posted Wed, 26 August 2009 at 8:39 AM
Wow, LostinSpaceman, sorry to cause offence. The way I read thomasrjm's post say's that he's having to use an old version of poser in which to enable him to be able to use the new version....that's OK?
My point was that, personaly, I am agrieved by the fact that I continue to buy a piece of software that wont do, at least for me, the job it was origianally designed to do which was to be a simple, easily posable manequin for artists! I don't need fantastic, super clever lighting. I don't need smooth flowing animation. All I need is an easily posable figure that I can apply textures to so I can speed up my painting workflow, I would have thought that this would be the easy part for a program like Poser and yet due to the dodgy memory management I dont get smooth posing and neither can I now apply textures without having to tediously trawl through masses of readme files to find the names of third party modelmakers so's I can tediously go through all my texture files enabling me to tediously apply them all in the material room!.
I don't recall ever mentioning the Library, although it would be nice if folk like myself with older eyes could see the thumbs! Lol Personally I don't care what they do to Poser so long as it WORKS!!!!
So, hipocrite? No! Mug? it would appear so!