Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Antonia - Opinions?

odf opened this issue on Oct 27, 2008 ยท 13933 posts


lesbentley posted Mon, 19 October 2009 at 7:00 AM

@odf,

Quote - lesbentley: Looks like my splitting script is working.

Great news, that saves me a ton of work :biggrin:. The exact names of the obj files do not matter, so long as one can tell what actor they belong to.

Quote - Which of Antonia's obj files do you want me to split for you? Just give me the file names.

The most up to date objs that have the old mapping, which I assume will be "Antonia-114.obj" and "Antonia-114-lo.obj". I'll do versions for the High and Low figures.

I think it will be best If I create two sub-folders under the Antonia Geometries folder for the high and low objs. Probably named "114_Hi" and "114_Low", unless you have some other preference that you would like me to use. For the geom injection pz2 files I was thinking of naming them "114_Hi_Geom.pz2", "116_Hi_Geom.pz2", "114_Lo_Geom.pz2", "116_Lo_Geom.pz2", unless you have another suggestion. It's hard to think of fully descriptive names that are short enough to display in the Poser interface.

There is no need to split the new 116 objs, as the default geometry can be restored by re-injecting the whole original declaration section. There may be a point in setting up the 116 cr2 so that it loads from individual obj files, as that would make it easier if at some future point there is a "117" geom but it was still desirable to swap in the 116 geom. However I think that may be a bit premature at this stage, and that we should make sure that swapping in the 114 geom is thoroughly tested and working without any bugs, before proceeding in that direction.

As soon as I get the objs, I'll start work on the injection files.