You really don’t want to get me started on the entirely different issue of the Iraq war and Iraq as far as I know, has nothing to do with defrauding the world into believing in anthropogenic global warming, the issue at hand. Besides, attempting to change the topic will not bolster your fanatical pro global warming argument especially in light of all the mounting evidence to the contrary…sunshine ;-)

 

“Again, this is politics, not facts that drives this. It shouldn't be discussed here.”

 

As far as facts go you certainly haven’t produced any. And not to confuse you with the facts, perhaps you haven’t been following along with this thread, this might come as a shock to you, but the ClimateGate scandal is precisely about how the facts have been manipulated. The facts for anthropogenic global warming (AGW) as they stand now are proving to be contrived and are most certainly politically driven. Any attempt to funnel vast amounts of money into a political system (e.g. the UN…IPCC) that perpetuates the fear mongering to control world economies and peoples, some may even go as far as saying to redistribute the wealth on a global scale is without a doubt politically driven.

 

Green is the new and modern world “gold rush” color. Let us be clear, no one disputes global warming per say. Most believe that it is cyclic and naturally occurring and the earth (and also other planets in the solar system) has phased in and out of cycles for milleniums. And let’s face it…if a naturally occurring cycle becomes full blown…for people to try and stop it would be like one person pissing into a volcano to put the fire out. It is the unfounded assumptions of AGW that gets the ire. Some studies propose that the human input into global warming is about 3%. Most Americans will concede and say that we as a nation being one of the largest consumers should not be oil dependent especially on unstable and unfriendly countries. We have plenty of bio fuel resources and the technology right within our shores to provide for ourselves but there are extreme political factions at play that would like to prohibit the expansion of those resources for one reason or another which I’ll not get into here but you are welcome to research for yourself. Consider that many industrialized countries use nuclear power to subsidize their energy needs but we, the nation that introduced nuclear power to the world, albeit abruptly, are restricted, ask yourself why.

 

Clean alternative energy sources is the way to go but the technology as it stands now is cost prohibitive to replace the relatively cheap infrastructure already in place which supplies us with our present needs. Corporate conglomerates, financial institutions and investment brokers hear the clamor and see a future in alternative sources and are starting to appropriate funds for research to colleges, universities, scientific institutions and even other countries. This is where the scheming and money grabbing starts and the fear mongering ensues. People positioned in high places with powerful contacts see a wide opened field to capitalize from and thus start laying down their own ground rules, and once set, by which all others must abide by. And this is where the United Nations (IPCC) has placed itself with the aid of wealthy backers and governments.

 

Dvlenk6, please, don’t go there…I’m seething at the hypocrisy and arrogance. Should I still be waiting for change? ;-)