PJF
That New York Times link can only be read by subscribing or paying for it. 

Let's keep this very, very civil lest the mods lock it.  No one is a Nazi or moron for their opinions and views. 

I would like for someone who remains unswayed by recent revelations of slanted data voice in with their reasoning without feeling threatened personally.   I should say that anyone holding to AGW (human induced warming) needs a better defense than pointing out big oil and tobacco company's misinformation in the past.  Pointing out falsehoods by one side does not make falsehoods from another more or less truthful.   Does that make sense?