eonite opened this issue on Nov 03, 2009 · 302 posts
eonite posted Sat, 19 December 2009 at 8:53 AM
Quote - Forgot to add: It might be useful to add a note in the metanode reference that states which metanodes are available in which pack to avoid confusion.
You`re right, this would avoid confusion.
My thought on this is that "Metanodes Reference" is not a document you study from the top to the bottom, but which you consult when you work with the metanodes in the FE and feel unsure about what the parameters are doing.
I should probably make a note that not every metanode is used in every pack.
Things are constantly evolving and sometimes there are last minute additions. For example in the upcoming CloudScape collection I decided to include a Cirrus cloud layer. At the heart of the function generating the cirrus clouds there is a metanode named "Cirrus 5" or so.
It has some great potential but its too new, so its not referenced in the existing "Metanodes Reference".