And it's much more difficult to prove female arousal in a picture than male arousal. And...once again...MY ARGUMENT ABOUT A PICTURE THAT WAS REALLY OFFENSIVE....Why was that not removed from gallery, and the other subsequent copycat pics from the same guy???? Either she was aroused beyond belief...Or, she had been mutilated. I am still upset over that one. Since then, we have had popsicles, fingers, snakes and fingers...(currently). There should not be a double standard, here. But, sadly, there does seem to be. Oh, oh...and, yes!!!! A graphic by Nikki was removed about a month ago for showing spent penises and puddles of "stuff" on the ground. That was one day beforethe picture that I found to be so very, very offensive was posted, and, allowed to remain. Now, the picture by Nikki had 6 figures, all intricately posed, an interesting background, and, facial expressions. The one I objected to...that was allowed to remain...had a photo background...a standard poser chick/texture, naked with legs spread in an impossible to do in real life position, and, focal point...extended...EXTENDED to the EXTREME..TO THE POINT OF MUTILATION, genitals. But, the male mods let this one stay. Hummmmm...sexism? You bet.