I don't think Poser users CLAIM to be CG artists. I don't.

But is what I do devoid of art? Well, let me ask this: "Is a photograph art?"

If it is, I argue so are Poser images.

The photographer selects of sets up an existing scene in space.
The photographer selects and poses an existing model (usually a human or other animal)
The photographer examines/selects/controls lighting.
The photographer decides on composition/angles/poses
The photographer attempts to impart meaning/storytelling/beauty into his images.

Every statement above can be true for someone using Poser.

LukeA may have created the set for me... Nature did it for the photographer.
Daz created Victoria... created the model for the photographer.
Bagginsbill may have created part of the light tool... JTL built them for the photographer.

I submit that what I'm doing with Poser and what a photographer is doing is kindred work. If you don't agree, fine. Go read LukeA's post (item 3, to be exact) for my sentiments. If your view is a photographer is not an artist, then we have no common ground to discuss the issue.

As with photography, I suggest that most renders are on a par with snapshots. It is the user who can bring together elements in a harmonious, meaningful way who is the "artist" (if a photographer can be considered an artist.) The rest are virtual instamatic camera users, and create work worth just about as much artistically. (I know this to be the case... I've taught photography at the college where I retired. Most student's work is dreadful until they start studying what makes a good photograph!)

And I agree... most Poser users are at just about that stage in their artistic abilities.

My $.02