I have no quarrel with what is written above. However, the writer is answering his own question. The issue here is simply that I posted my pic in good faith and in reliance upon what was published right here as acceptable content. Within hours the pic was deleted on the basis (I later learned) of a complaint to EdgeNets management. Not unreasonably I asked for the identity of the complainant and the text of the complaint. Disclosure of this information was declined and remains declined. I thought conviction via dennuciation by unnamed parties became unfashionable in the 16th century. Dosen't what happened strike you as unfair? I want to go on record by saying that I do not believe that any person on the forum team was or is in any way involved with this unfortunate affair. Everything I have seen points to someone in the executive suite. Yes it's possible I will profit from what has happened. Stravinsky's fortune was made when a riot ensued during the first performance of the "Rite of Spring." However, a necessary and universal requirement to reach this happy state of affairs is that the object of contention be of quality sufficent to reasonably stand the test of time. Therefore only time will tell in respect to the issue of my personal enrichment. Christine