DAM3D opened this issue on Apr 06, 2010 · 33 posts
Quest posted Wed, 05 May 2010 at 2:25 PM
When artists decide to put their works up for free or in the public domain they place conditions of that transfer whether it be not for commercial use or to be used freely in any way or for a simple credit mention back to the author. These are conditions of copyright transference. So if an artist asks for credit mention why would we repay their kindness and hard work by begrudging and disrespecting the conditions of the transfer? We are quick to grab the free labor of others but too lazy to give them mention for their generosity when we are praised for our great artistic endeavors when using their work.
The question of Shepard Fairey and Mannie Garcia is one of derivative works. Where one work is created from a prior preexisting work and is covered under U.S.C. Title 17 Chapter 1 §103(b):
“The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material.”
Just like "The Westside story" and "Romeo and Juliet"